Architecture & Design Decisions
This document outlines the architectural patterns, design decisions, and technical philosophy behind the BugBounty KSP platform.
ποΈ System Overview
The BugBounty KSP platform is built as a modern, scalable application using a microservices-inspired architecture with the following key components:
βββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
β Frontend Layer β
β (React + TypeScript + Component Library) β
ββββββββββββββββββββββ¬βββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
β
ββββββββββββββββββββββΌβββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
β API Gateway β
β (Express.js + Authentication) β
βββββ¬βββββββββββββ¬βββββββββββββ¬βββββββββββββ¬βββββββββββββββ
β β β β
βββββΌβββββ βββββΌβββββ βββββΌβββββ βββββΌβββββ
β Bounty β β User β βReports β β Admin β
βService β βService β βService β βService β
βββββ¬βββββ βββββ¬βββββ βββββ¬βββββ βββββ¬βββββ
β β β β
ββββββββββββββ΄βββββββββββββ΄βββββββββββββ
β
ββββββββββββββββββΌβββββββββββββββββ
β PostgreSQL + Redis β
ββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
External Integrations:
βββ Discord Bot
βββ n8n Workflows
βββ Knowledge Graph Engine
π― Core Design Principles
1. Modularity & Separation of Concerns
Decision: Use a layered architecture with clear separation between presentation, business logic, and data layers.
Rationale:
- Easier to maintain and test
- Allows independent scaling of components
- Reduces coupling between modules
- Facilitates team collaboration
Implementation:
src/
βββ api/ # HTTP endpoints (Presentation)
βββ services/ # Business logic (Domain)
βββ models/ # Data access (Data)
βββ utils/ # Shared utilities
2. API-First Design
Decision: RESTful API with OpenAPI specification.
Rationale:
- Clear contract between frontend and backend
- Enables multiple client applications
- Facilitates third-party integrations
- Self-documenting with Swagger/OpenAPI
Standards:
- RESTful conventions (GET, POST, PUT, DELETE, PATCH)
- Versioned endpoints (
/api/v1/...) - Consistent response formats
- Proper HTTP status codes
3. Component-Based Frontend
Decision: React with TypeScript and a custom component library.
Rationale:
- Type safety reduces runtime errors
- Reusable components ensure consistency
- Better developer experience
- Easier refactoring and maintenance
Key Libraries:
- React 18+ (UI framework)
- TypeScript 5+ (Type safety)
- Styled Components (CSS-in-JS)
- React Query (Data fetching)
π§ Technology Stack
Backend
- Runtime: Node.js 18+
- Framework: Express.js
- Language: TypeScript
- Database: PostgreSQL 14+
- Cache: Redis
- ORM: Prisma / TypeORM
- Authentication: JWT + Passport.js
- Testing: Jest + Supertest
Frontend
- Framework: React 18+
- Language: TypeScript
- Build Tool: Vite / Webpack
- State Management: React Context + React Query
- Styling: Styled Components / Tailwind CSS
- Testing: Jest + React Testing Library
Infrastructure
- Container: Docker
- Orchestration: Docker Compose / Kubernetes
- CI/CD: GitHub Actions
- Monitoring: Prometheus + Grafana
- Logging: Winston / Pino
π Database Design
Key Entities
-- Users
Users
βββ id (UUID)
βββ email (UNIQUE)
βββ password_hash
βββ role (ENUM: admin, researcher, client)
βββ created_at
-- Bounty Programs
BountyPrograms
βββ id (UUID)
βββ name
βββ description
βββ reward_range
βββ scope
βββ status (ENUM: active, paused, closed)
-- Vulnerability Reports
VulnerabilityReports
βββ id (UUID)
βββ program_id (FK)
βββ researcher_id (FK)
βββ title
βββ severity (ENUM: critical, high, medium, low)
βββ status (ENUM: new, triaged, accepted, resolved)
βββ submitted_at
-- Knowledge Graph
KnowledgeNodes
βββ id (UUID)
βββ type (ENUM: concept, technique, tool)
βββ title
βββ content
βββ relationships (JSONB)
Database Patterns
- UUID: Primary keys for security and distribution
- Soft Deletes: Preserve data integrity
- Timestamps: Track creation and modification
- Indexing: Optimize common queries
- JSONB: Flexible schema for metadata
π Security Architecture
Authentication & Authorization
Strategy: JWT-based authentication with role-based access control (RBAC).
// User Roles
enum Role {
ADMIN = 'admin', // Full system access
CLIENT = 'client', // Manage programs
RESEARCHER = 'researcher', // Submit reports
GUEST = 'guest' // Read-only access
}
// Permission Model
interface Permission {
resource: string;
actions: ('create' | 'read' | 'update' | 'delete')[];
}
Security Measures
- Input Validation: Zod schemas for all inputs
- SQL Injection Prevention: Parameterized queries
- XSS Protection: Content Security Policy
- CSRF Protection: Token-based validation
- Rate Limiting: Prevent abuse
- Encryption: TLS/SSL in transit, bcrypt at rest
π Integration Architecture
Discord Integration
Pattern: Event-driven architecture with webhooks.
- Bot listens for commands
- Publishes events to message queue
- Workers process events asynchronously
- Results posted back to Discord
n8n Workflows
Pattern: Webhook-triggered automation.
- Platform triggers webhooks on events
- n8n processes workflows
- Results sent back via API
- Audit trail maintained
Knowledge Graph
Pattern: Graph database with REST API.
- Nodes represent concepts/techniques
- Edges represent relationships
- GraphQL for complex queries
- Cached for performance
π Scalability Patterns
Horizontal Scaling
- Stateless API servers
- Load balancer (nginx/HAProxy)
- Database read replicas
- Redis cluster for sessions
Caching Strategy
- Browser Cache: Static assets
- CDN: Media files
- Redis: Session data, API responses
- Database: Query result cache
Performance Optimization
- Database indexing on frequent queries
- Pagination for large datasets
- Lazy loading for frontend components
- Background jobs for heavy operations
π§ͺ Testing Strategy
Test Pyramid
ββββββββββ
β E2E β (10%)
ββ΄βββββββββ΄β
βIntegrationβ (30%)
ββ΄ββββββββββββ΄β
β Unit β (60%)
ββββββββββββββββ
Unit Tests: 60% - Test individual functions/components
Integration Tests: 30% - Test service interactions
E2E Tests: 10% - Test critical user flows
π Design Decision Records (ADR)
ADR-001: Use TypeScript
Status: Accepted
Decision: Use TypeScript for both frontend and backend
Rationale: Type safety, better IDE support, fewer runtime errors
ADR-002: Monorepo vs Multi-repo
Status: Accepted
Decision: Multi-repo approach with separate repositories
Rationale: Better access control, independent versioning, clearer boundaries
ADR-003: REST vs GraphQL
Status: Accepted
Decision: REST API with optional GraphQL for knowledge graph
Rationale: Simpler to implement, well-understood, sufficient for most use cases
ADR-004: Docker Deployment
Status: Accepted
Decision: Containerize all services with Docker
Rationale: Consistent environments, easier deployment, portable
π Further Reading
| β Getting Started | Home | Next: API Reference β |